
|
About Richard |
Age:
38
Weight: 172 lbs. Gender: heterosexual Vision of heaven: you are surrounded by pillows Some features of the site change daily, so come back tomorrow! You can email Dr. Rich at brloggins@yahoo.com Laura said... Rich said... Thanks, Laura. Lets' face it, I have to give academia some consideration. Don't get me wrong, but continuing to teach seventh grade with a doctorite in hand seems like a waist of talent at best and immoral at worst. Older and brighter students await my guideance as they waiver on the precipiece of a malignant metaphysical fermament. I'm tired of blank stairs. 01 November 2006 12:47 AM Andy said... Hi Dr. Rich,
03 November 2006 04:24 AM Rich said... I do know what you mean.
03 November 2006 05:09 AM Laura said... Hi Andy,
03 November 2006 11:48 PM Rich said... The art of zen and motorcycle manetenance, when consumed, produces not only exsquisite shit, but tons and tons of it. And it never seems to end! I've devoured this art to the point of excess, but it just keeps on giving! (OK, I'm a little slow on the uptake, but give me enough time and I'll figure it out) 04 November 2006 02:03 AM I'm curious, you give your weight but not your height. Is this mormally the practice of heterosexuals? It seems to me that someone so proudly heterosexual that they would list their sexual orientation would include their height along with their weight along with a reminder that he or she was disease and drug free as well as what he or she was seeking such as friends with benefits. Perhaps you are hiding something, Richard? Not that it matters to me. Or maybe it does. You do look kinda cute in those 3d glasses and in that cowboy hat. 13 June 2007 09:52 PM Rich said... I cant' say why I mentioned weight and not height. Maybe its like what a comedian-writer friend of mine once said: "I'm afraid of heights. Not too crazy about weights, either".
14 June 2007 02:06 PM |
|
Quality Crossword |
|
|
Arrive Without Travelling - A Review |
Today I am going to review the new release by Anthony "Doc" McWatt
called, "Arrive Without Travelling", a first in a series
of DVDs being sold on his website that showcases the MOQ Conference held in
Liverpool in 2005. With this DVD, McWatt is unveiling his first
above-board activity in about three years.
Let's see if it was worth the wait, shall we?
For those like myself who couldn't attend the Liverpool Conference (I had a good excuse, afterall), I was much looking forward to seeing what I'd missed. The filming was done by the BBC, so it should at least look good. The video and sound editing, however, were left to amateurs. Naturally, I was anxious to see what they had done to it. I had submitted a paper that was read out called, "Quality in the New Millennium". It was extremely well received, so I had a personal interest in this.
Without further ado I should say that the DVD does not disappoint!
To my delight, through the full 100 minutes,
I felt like an actual participant, enjoying the friendly banter and
chit-chat that pervades this film. To all those who were there, let me
tell you, you are now my friends! I love you all! The Great Author comes
across not as the distant, enlightened guru that he is thought to be, but
as a quiet, affable Grandpa who can't impart the meaning at the core of the MOQ
any better than the rest of us. The lesson learned here is that we
cannot "arrive" without travelling that difficult road ourselves. Amen.
The heart of this DVD (first in a series) is the presentation of the conference papers. I gotta tell you - 100% sincere - these are truly spellbinding under McWatt's direction. Sure, I had read all the papers before and thought they were, well, I thought they kind of sucked. But Doc McWatt took these "ugly linens" and ingeniously used his knife to carve selections from each to form "golden tapestries". Combine a voice delivery to these dressed up versions and you add a dimension to their quality that was never there before. Stunning. The expertly edited extract of Mati Palm-Leis' paper, in particular, came across so much better on film. You would hardly know that his paper was about a real-life failure of the acceptance of the MOQ. Some papers, like Gavin Gee-Clough's that rail against vapid academic intellectualism, were best presented in their entirety. But the clear winner of the film is David Buchanan's paper, "Fun with Blasphemy", which outlines some ideas he has for a screenplay. The Q&A period for this paper is special because David's Hero, sitting right there in the room with him, has a strong emotional reaction to his choice of Orpheus as the central figure of that screenplay. And it is all caught on film - the tears in the eyes and the personal revelations! We feel David makes the right call here by acting surprised when his Hero explains how deeply Jean Cocteau's film "Orpheus" affected him - a film he had seen during the period in his life when he was descending into madness. How else can David get the man to open up and produce a magic movie moment like that? My cowboy hat is off to David. What he did was clever and it should sell some DVDs, too! My own paper and Mark Maxwell's paper did not feature, but I take it on "good faith" that these copywrited materials are being held out for the grand finale in the DVD series, where they will provide that extra oomph (in sales). The silky voice of trained actor David Boyce, who read out my paper, will undoubtedly dazzle DVD buyers as much as it did the attendees. Maxwell's paper (the other paper Mrs. Pirsig praised, in a correspondence Doc McWatt graciously shared with me shortly after the conference) features a real live crossbow and no one is going to want to miss the drama of that! So the best is yet to come! I do not know if Doc McWatt had any production assistance with this DVD, but his slicing and dicing is as clever as anything he has done in print media (see Baggini interview). Video of a life-size bronze bison is used as interesting filler for talkovers, as are psychedelic images of the Beatles that are included to pay homage to the time when McWatt first joined university. Doc McWatt is to be congratulated for an excellent initial foray into film-making. One can only expect that the next DVD in the series will have similar production values that, like a good skin cream, can make the face of the MOQ look good under any light. I give this 4 stars and a big thumbs up! b.r.loggins Please be advised that Dr. Rich will no longer be fielding comments that question the sincerity of this review or express doubts that he even viewed the DVD. Readers are advised to direct such comments to Ian Glendinning, an expert in the detection and prevention of sarcasm and holder of the maverick view that sincerity is not tarnished by omissions of truth. All other comments directed at the review or that compliment Richard's motives are of course welcome. Laura said... Now look. I've told you before. I'm not going to comment unless you can prove to me that this is a sincere review done with honesty and integrity and with the intention of trying to build something positive. There are so many criminals (thieves, liars, blackmailers, etc) out there that I need to be sure I am keeping the right company; particularly now that I have just about managed to penetrate Bob's intimate circle! 03 June 2008 11:44 PM Richard said... I am always sinsere, Laura. I have been blogging for 3 years now and there is nothing more important to Richard's agenda than honesty/integraty, and any suggestions otherwise represent the biggest source of insult (to Richard). What, no hug? 04 June 2008 02:21 PM Laura said... Well that is a relief.
05 June 2008 08:16 AM Richard said... Thats right, Laura. I will stand for nothing more than questionable propaganda, here. And yes, I do not have 8 or 9 self-serving, pompous commandments. I only have 2 (see above). And there purpose really is to put tact and mannerlyness at the forfront of this discussion and, most of all, to keep Dr. Rich honest. Thank you for the compliments and good luck breeching the intimate circle!
05 June 2008 01:13 PM You make sarcasm too easy to detect Rich ;-) 07 June 2008 01:58 PM Dr. Loggins said... I am 100% sincere. Have we now moved from private insults to public barbs, Mr. Glendinning? Keep attacking me. See where it gets you!! 07 June 2008 03:20 PM Laura said... Loved the bit about Orpheus and that incredible coincidence. Isn't somebody writing a screen play about that? 'The Lyre of Orpheus'?
21 June 2008 07:47 AM |
|
MOQ Quiz |
Quiz is such an
SOM
term, isn't it? It consists of a series of questions
each demanding a single correct answer. It agrees with the
SOM
assumption that absolute truth exists. As far as the
MOQ
is concerned,
experience isn't like that. Under the
MOQ
there is
no longer a demand for force fitting a single truth. A quiz, therefore, of
the multiple choice variety, would more appropriately be termed a poll in
Quality parlance. There are no "wrong" answers in a poll. So relax and
enjoy the poll. It's all good.
Take me to the poll
!
|
|
Striving for Olympic Bronze |
On 23 Feb 2006, during the Winter Olympics, Richard sent this article he wrote to the British tabloid, The Sun, hoping to have it published. He has no idea what they did with it. It's well-known that certain countries excel at one particular sport or event at the Olympic games. Korea in short track skating, Australia in swimming, Holland in speed skating, Russia in ice dancing. But did you know that Canada excels in curling? In fact it's the only country that cares about curling. Canada is actually trying to get other countries interested in curling. I read with some enjoyment (although it was totally buried in the sports news) that both the U.S. and Britain reached the curling semi-finals. Canada crushed the U.S. and Britain lost their match (to whom, I don't know), so that the U.S. and Britain will be fighting (scratching, clawing, brooming) for the coveted curling bronze medal in a head-to-head competition tomorrow. The U.S. team is comprised of people solely from Minnesota, the only state in the Union that gives a shit about curling. Not coincidently, Minnesota is very close to Canada, which gives me a sinking suspicion that the U.S. team is actually a bunch of Canadians who defected when they couldn't make the A-team. The curling match-off for the bronze will be a lot more interesting than the gold/silver match, since we already know the Canadians will win that one. A lot more is at stake for our countries. For example, the U.S. has, as has become commonplace at the Olympics, underperformed (Bodie Miller, ice hockey team, men's moguls) and is once again an embarrassment to the Free World considering its size and wealth. Also, and the real issue here, is that we have only 4 bronze medals to 7 or 8 each for gold and silver and it would be nice to have a better balance. Britain, on the other hand, would be happy to win a medal of any color and in fact a triumph over the U.S. would double its current medal output. Don't tell me there's not a huge front-page headline in the Sun that says: "England Poised to take Curling Bronze".
What's really important is that we keep our heads high, have fun, try our best and may the better team win the brown medal with the hole in the middle. |
|
Leaning Wrenches |
These striking photos of the giant Craff-Kiln wrench sculpture (Mohave desert, Nevada), sent to
Richard by a former summer school student,
prove beyond a doubt that the mind creates its own vision of reality. In a classic case
of cultural conditioning, people reared on the
Subject Object Metaphysics invariably see the wrench on the right as
tilting more than the wrench on the left, even though the images are identical. Try as you
might to not see it that way, the exaggerated lean of the right wrench persists.
But this is not a problem for Richard. Gifted as he is with the rare "medical disorder" known as Neural Ampblyopia and thus not being acculturated to objects from birth, he sees clearly and with no effort that the wrenches are perfectly parallel. In other words, he sees the wrenches as they really are - as reality intends them to be. According to Dr. Rich, the tilt problem afflicting most Westerners is symptomatic of a syndrome that strikes when elementary school children learn the mathematics and philosophy of René Descartes. The Cartesian worldview that has prevailed for centuries actually skews reality to the point where it is fundamentally misrepresented and inevitably incomprehensible. Is it any wonder why no one can wrap their head around such things as Gödel's Theorem, General Relativity, Quantum Mechanics, or the Barber's Paradox, when they cannot even keep the wrenches straight? |