
|
About Richard |
Age:
41
Weight: 178 lbs. Gender: happy old man Vision of heaven: just me and Bob. And pillows. Some features of the site change daily, so come back tomorrow! You can email Dr. Rich at brloggins@yahoo.com Laura said... Rich said... Thanks, Laura. Lets' face it, I have to give academia some consideration. Don't get me wrong, but continuing to teach seventh grade with a doctorite in hand seems like a waist of talent at best and immoral at worst. Older and brighter students await my guideance as they waiver on the precipiece of a malignant metaphysical fermament. I'm tired of blank stairs. 01 November 2006 12:47 AM Andy said... Hi Dr. Rich,
03 November 2006 04:24 AM Rich said... I do know what you mean.
03 November 2006 05:09 AM Laura said... Hi Andy,
03 November 2006 11:48 PM Rich said... The art of zen and motorcycle manetenance, when consumed, produces not only exsquisite shit, but tons and tons of it. And it never seems to end! I've devoured this art to the point of excess, but it just keeps on giving! (OK, I'm a little slow on the uptake, but give me enough time and I'll figure it out) 04 November 2006 02:03 AM I'm curious, you give your weight but not your height. Is this mormally the practice of heterosexuals? It seems to me that someone so proudly heterosexual that they would list their sexual orientation would include their height along with their weight along with a reminder that he or she was disease and drug free as well as what he or she was seeking such as friends with benefits. Perhaps you are hiding something, Richard? Not that it matters to me. Or maybe it does. You do look kinda cute in those 3d glasses and in that cowboy hat. 13 June 2007 09:52 PM Rich said... I cant' say why I mentioned weight and not height. Maybe its like what a comedian-writer friend of mine once said: "I'm afraid of heights. Not too crazy about weights, either".
14 June 2007 02:06 PM |
|
Quality Crossword |
|
|
MOQ Quiz |
Quiz is such an
SOM
term, isn't it? It consists of a series of questions
each demanding a single correct answer. It agrees with the
SOM
assumption that absolute truth exists. As far as the
MOQ
is concerned,
experience isn't like that. Under the
MOQ
there is
no longer a demand for force fitting a single truth. A quiz, therefore, of
the multiple choice variety, would more appropriately be termed a poll in
Quality parlance. There are no "wrong" answers in a poll. So relax and
enjoy the poll. It's all good.
Take me to the poll
!
|
|
Head Races |
%42od%59> Rich said... Use Ctrl-Click or Shift-Click to pick up to three contestents in the verticle scroling window on the left, or just watch the cameras race. Click on the grass to put the contestents on they're mark. Click the starting gun to set them off.
25 January 2007 02:04 PM |
|
Ph.D. Announcement |
is
proud
to
announce
that he is the first American to receive a
Ph.D. in philosophy with a dissertation concerning itself with the
Metaphysics of Quality.
A diploma arrived in the mail in April 2006, and he can't get over how painless
the whole process was.
"I don't understand why people still bother spending years and years at
university when a doctorate can be had right over the Internet, at
a fraction of the time and cost."
I know what you're thinking, but you can see here that it is
certifiably genuine.
Dr. Loggins' eight (8) page Ph.D. thesis, entitled Quality in the New Millennium, took nearly three (3) weeks to write and is now being offered exclusively on this site for US$29.38 or the equivalent in Pounds Sterling. Laura said... Hi Rich,
02 February 2007 11:38 PM |
|
Cracker Testing |
Dr. Rich is the lonely but passionate sort who never passes up
an opportunity to answer a phone or Internet survey or write reviews
about things he buys online. For several years now he's been involved in
product testing for Nabisco, a company that, for the most part, bakes
and sells crackers. They are well-known for making Ritz Crackers®,
Saltines®, and Cheese Nips®, to name but a few of their brands.
It couldn't be easier for Richard. He doesn't even have to leave the house. Every few months, Nabisco's quality division mails him a package that contains samples of a product for him to judge. One month they might be testing Saltines and so they'll send him two sealed packages of Saltines. Each package is identified by a number. For example, one might be #367 and the other #293. Each might be a different variation on the Saltine recipe, so there's a questionaire that compares the texture, flavor, and appearance. He mails the completed questionaire back to them in a prepaid envelope. Richard loves doing this. He provides a service and in return gets a free snack. There are only a couple of minor issues. Truth be known, for every package he receives from Nabisco, he can't taste, feel, or see a single difference in the two samples being compared. The survey form clearly has a 'no difference' check box you can mark if this is the situation, but Richard never marks it. "You know, if I look hard enough I can see that one is baked longer and is a little browner. I can also discern small differences in taste and saltiness if I shut my eyes and tilt my head upwards a little while chewing. I have it worked out to a science." Richard is no dope. It has occurred to him that Nabisco might be sending him identical product as part of a control group, but he waves off such thoughts. "They might have started me off in the control group, but I'm sure that after seeing how discerning I was, they moved me into the test group. I'm too valuable to them as a control subject." He has one other minor gripe. Nabisco also makes Oreos® and Mallomars®. "Why don't they ever send me those?" |